Oral Abstracts Session
Virtual Recording
Moses Cook, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Moses Cook, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Thomas Garrett, BSc
Research Assistant
Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, United States
Danielle Kara, PhD
Staff Scientist
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Yuchi Liu, PhD
Research Scientist
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Shi Chen, BSc
Research Coordinator
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Arwa Younis, MD
Research Fellow
Cleveland Clinic, United States
Masafumi Sugawara, MD
Research Fellow
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Xiaoming Bi, PhD
Director, Cardiovascular MR Collaborations
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Oak Park, California, United States
Oussama Wazni, MD, MBA
Physician
Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing at Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Hiroshi Nakagawa, MD, PhD
M.D., Ph.D
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Deborah Kwon, MD, FSCMR
Director of Cardiac MRI
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Christopher Nguyen, PhD, FSCMR
Director, Cardiovascular Innovation Research Center
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Figure 2: A) Standard deviations across the left ventricle were lower for mean diffusivity (MD) in b=1000 s/mm2 images compared to b=500 s/mm2 images (0.24±0.06 vs. 0.37±0.09×10-3 mm2/s, p<0.001). FA (0.087±0.017 vs. 0.136±0.034, p<0.001). B) Standard deviations across the left ventricle were lower for fractional anisotropy (FA) in b=1000 s/mm2 images compared to b=500 s/mm2 images (0.087±0.017 vs. 0.136±0.034, p<0.001). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant after paired t-test.
Figure 3: A) The b=1000 s/mm2 images produced significantly lower mean diffusivity (MD) compared to b=500 s/mm2 images (1.42±0.05 vs. 1.51±0.09×10-3 mm2/s, p<0.001). B) The b=1000 s/mm2 images produced significantly lower fractional anisotropy (FA) (0.298±0.016 vs. 0.329±0.023, p<0.001). C) The b=1000 s/mm2 images produced significantly more negative HAT (-0.83±0.09 vs. -0.79±0.08 °/%, p=0.048). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant after paired t-test. .png)